英语翻译Product liability suits are usually based on either of t

英语翻译
Product liability suits are usually based on either of two legal theories,negligence or strict liability-both of which are tort actions.
NEGLIGENCE
One legal theory that is available to people who are injured by faulty products is negligence.This tort,which is explained more fully in Chapter 5,may be defined as the failure to exercise that degree of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised under the same circumstances and conditions.In order to recover for negligence in a product liability case,it is necessary to prove all of the following:that there was a negligent act on the part of the manufactturer or supplier of the goods;that injuries were suffered by someone who used the goods;and that the injuries were caused by the negligent act.
It is not easy for an injured consumer to win a case on the theory of negligence because injured parties usually have no evidence of a negligent act by the manufacturer.They were not present when the goods were made and normally have very little information about the manufacturing process.Injured parties are often more successful in bringing suit for breach of warranty of merchantability rather than negligence.
Valez was driving on an interstate highway in a brand-new

产品责任诉讼,通常的基础上有两种法律理论,疏忽或严格责任-这两者都是侵权的行动.
疏忽
一法律的理论,是提供给人们谁是受伤的错误的产品是negligence.this侵权,更充分地在第5章,可界定为失败的行使程度的照顾一个相当审慎的人会行使下同样的情况和conditions.in以收回疏忽,在产品责任案件,这是必要的,以证明所有有关下列各点：有一个疏忽行为对部分的manufactturer商或供应商的货物;受伤而遭受有人谁使用的货物; ,并认为人受伤所造成的疏忽行为.
它是不容易受伤的消费者打赢一场案件的理论疏忽,因为受害方通常都没有证据显示有疏忽行为所manufacturer.they不在场时,货物发了言,并且通常很少有信息制造业process.injured各方往往更成功地使适合于违反保证的适销性,而不是疏忽.
valez驾驶的1号州际公路上公路在一个崭新的