求英语高手,分析下句子
来源:学生作业帮 编辑:百度作业网作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/08/19 09:33:44
求英语高手,分析下句子
Even(什么成分,如何理解?) development in architecture has been the result of major technological changes. (这个句子是主系表结构吗?)Materials and methods of construction areintegral(part的定语对吗?)parts of (design的状语对吗?)the design of(arichitecture的状语对吗?) architecture structures. In earlier times it was necessary to design structural systems suitable for the materialsthat were available, such as wood, stone, brick.
麻烦帮我解释下it was necessary to do sth.的用法好吗?design是谓语动词吗?我不明白.
还有suitable for the materials事system 的补语对吗?that were available又是什么成分呢?最后的such as wood, stone, brick.做什么成分?语法上怎么解释?
Even(什么成分,如何理解?) development in architecture has been the result of major technological changes. (这个句子是主系表结构吗?)Materials and methods of construction areintegral(part的定语对吗?)parts of (design的状语对吗?)the design of(arichitecture的状语对吗?) architecture structures. In earlier times it was necessary to design structural systems suitable for the materialsthat were available, such as wood, stone, brick.
麻烦帮我解释下it was necessary to do sth.的用法好吗?design是谓语动词吗?我不明白.
还有suitable for the materials事system 的补语对吗?that were available又是什么成分呢?最后的such as wood, stone, brick.做什么成分?语法上怎么解释?
![求英语高手,分析下句子](/uploads/image/z/5850790-70-0.jpg?t=%E6%B1%82%E8%8B%B1%E8%AF%AD%E9%AB%98%E6%89%8B%2C%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E4%B8%8B%E5%8F%A5%E5%AD%90)
1.even副词,“甚至;即使”,状语,对句子结构没有影响.
2.第一句话是主系表结构,只不过用了完成时.
3.intergral是parts的定语.
4.design前有the,可见是名词,没有状语.of the design定语,修饰parts.
5.of architecture structures介词短语,作定语,修饰the design.其中,architecture是修饰structures的定语.
6.It is necessary to do sth.做某事是必要的.it做形式主语,指代实际的主语to do sth.【如果把to do sth直接放在前面做主语的话,那主语部分就太长了,头重脚轻,句子不平衡,所以就用it作形式主语,把实际的主语不定式放在后面.
7.design有名词、动词两种词性,做动词时才可能是谓语.It was necessary to design structural systems这个句子中,to design structural systems是不定式短语,是句子实际的主语.
8.suitable for the materials是systems的定语.
9.that were available定语从句,修饰the materials
10.such as...“例如...”,表示列举,是前面materials(材料)的具体例子.
再问: 请问it was necessary to do sth.可以理解为主系表结构吗? 还有such as在剧中做什么成分呢?
再答: It was necessary to do sth是主系表结构。 such as wood, stone, brick在句中作状语。
再问: 最后在请问一下,design在这里是做名词吗?说不通啊,我觉得明显是个动词啊,属于非谓语动词吗?因为it necessary to do sth. do应该表示动作啊。
再答: 在It was necessary to design structural systems这个句子中,design是动词,因为它后面有宾语。但是它前面有to,to design是不定式,不定式属非谓语动词。 说It is necessary to do sth表示动作这种说法是不严密的。“做某事是必要的”,“...是...”这是一个主系表结构,以be为系动词的主系表结构大多是表示状态的。【要知道,这个句型的谓语是is,而不是to do】
2.第一句话是主系表结构,只不过用了完成时.
3.intergral是parts的定语.
4.design前有the,可见是名词,没有状语.of the design定语,修饰parts.
5.of architecture structures介词短语,作定语,修饰the design.其中,architecture是修饰structures的定语.
6.It is necessary to do sth.做某事是必要的.it做形式主语,指代实际的主语to do sth.【如果把to do sth直接放在前面做主语的话,那主语部分就太长了,头重脚轻,句子不平衡,所以就用it作形式主语,把实际的主语不定式放在后面.
7.design有名词、动词两种词性,做动词时才可能是谓语.It was necessary to design structural systems这个句子中,to design structural systems是不定式短语,是句子实际的主语.
8.suitable for the materials是systems的定语.
9.that were available定语从句,修饰the materials
10.such as...“例如...”,表示列举,是前面materials(材料)的具体例子.
再问: 请问it was necessary to do sth.可以理解为主系表结构吗? 还有such as在剧中做什么成分呢?
再答: It was necessary to do sth是主系表结构。 such as wood, stone, brick在句中作状语。
再问: 最后在请问一下,design在这里是做名词吗?说不通啊,我觉得明显是个动词啊,属于非谓语动词吗?因为it necessary to do sth. do应该表示动作啊。
再答: 在It was necessary to design structural systems这个句子中,design是动词,因为它后面有宾语。但是它前面有to,to design是不定式,不定式属非谓语动词。 说It is necessary to do sth表示动作这种说法是不严密的。“做某事是必要的”,“...是...”这是一个主系表结构,以be为系动词的主系表结构大多是表示状态的。【要知道,这个句型的谓语是is,而不是to do】